BETAmodules.com is in beta — open to partnerships & joint ventures.Build with us

innit

v0.1.0RubyGems· Ruby

Instead of the awkward form: [1,2,3].include?(elem), you can now use: elem.in?([1,2,3])

The verdict
Abandoned. Last published 10 years ago. No recent activity — look for a maintained alternative.
No recent activity — look for a maintained alternative.
Live from the RubyGems registry · derived rules, not AI
How it scores
MaintenanceAbandoned
PopularityNiche
SecurityClean
LicensePermissive
DepsZero deps
Maintenance
Last published 10 years ago.
Popularity
7 downloads / week
Security
No known advisories for this version (OSV).
License
MIT
Dependencies
No runtime dependencies
Recent releases
  • 0.1.010 years ago
innit — Instead of the awkward form: [1,2,3].include?(elem), you can now use: elem.in?([1,2,3]) (Ruby / RubyGems) · Modules