Results for some-truthy

Checks if the callback returns truthy for any element of the array. Iteration is stopped once the callback returns truthy Return the truthy value or the last falsy value if none of the iteration returns truthy

Splits a String into an Array of substrings with the option to skip some cases where the separator is found, based on some truthy condition.

Checks if the callback returns truthy for any element of the array. Iteration is stopped once the callback returns truthy Return the truthy value or the last falsy value if none of the iteration returns truthy Run over the given array from right to

A tiny invariant function

Matches strings against configurable strings, globs, regular expressions, and/or functions

short-circuited, asynchronous version of Array.protototype.some

Properly hijack require, i.e., properly define require hooks and customizations

Assertions and Validations for TypeScript

A package used by Expo CLI for processing images

Compare items in two sequences to find a longest common subsequence

Nanoscale assertion module

Compare items in two sequences to find a longest common subsequence

A CSS-inspired language to select, sequence, and compose DOM events.

Determine if a JavaScript object is numeric

Common utility functions

Let your JS API users either give you a callback or receive a promise

Node.js final http responder

Super-simple invariant function

A tiny (183B to 210B) and fast utility to ascend parent directories

Template-based docx report creation

A shared utility package for Powertools for AWS Lambda (TypeScript) libraries

Determines if something should be considered a synonym for true

A pure JS implementation SHA256.

SHA256 wrapper for browsers that prefers `window.crypto.subtle` but will fall back to a pure JS implementation in @aws-crypto/sha256-js to provide a consistent interface for SHA256.

IfElse is an implementation of the pure object-oriented conditional syntax found in languages of the SmallTalk family, including Self. Those languages distinguish themselves by taking the "everything is an object / everything is a method" approach to a further extreme than Ruby, and getting rid of almost all cases of special syntax other than object definition and method call. Ruby, of course, already works this way for some purposes -- thus most Ruby developers prefer to write [1, 17, 39].each {|x| puts x} rather than for x in [1, 17, 39] puts x end and 3.times {|n| puts n} instead of i = 1 while i <= 3 puts i i += 1 end This module extends that same preference to conditional statements, providing replacements for the Ruby keywords +if+, and +unless+: x = 1 (x >= 0).if {puts 'positive'} (x < 0).unless {puts 'positive'} Note that as with the built-in special forms these methods replace, these methods are available on any Ruby Object, and obey the usual rules of which values are considered "Truthy" and "Falsey". <b>Note that the primary purpose of this gem is to demonstrate that the built-in (special form) versions of conditionals provided with Ruby are mostly syntactic sugar -- as with the +for+ keyword, there is no real need for these to be built into the language. With that said, the gem is fully tested, has no particular performance penalty (beyond the usual cost of method dispatch), and should be fully useable in general purpose code.</b> <b>Note also that while Smalltalk-family languages also provide an equivalent to the Ruby +else+ keyword, this depends on the more general block/lambda capability of those languages, which allow a method to take multiple blocks as arguments. This could be imitated with a syntax like:</b> # NOT A REAL EXAMPLE (x > 42).if then: lambda {|x| :big }, else: lambda {|x| :small} <b>which is true to the SmallTalk original, but feels less Ruby-ish to me, so I didn't implement this -- perhaps in a later version.</b>